Print

Standard

Success or Failure? Effectiveness of Consumer ODR Platforms in Brazil and in the EU. / Schmidt-Kessen, Maria Jose ; Nogueira, Rafaela; Cantero Gamito, Marta.

In: Journal of Consumer Policy, 12.02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Schmidt-Kessen, Maria Jose ; Nogueira, Rafaela ; Cantero Gamito, Marta. / Success or Failure? Effectiveness of Consumer ODR Platforms in Brazil and in the EU. In: Journal of Consumer Policy. 2020.

Bibtex

@article{eae7327cb9dd442bb35370a279644791,
title = "Success or Failure?: Effectiveness of Consumer ODR Platforms in Brazil and in the EU",
abstract = "This article examines the effectiveness of out-of-court procedures, in particular in theform of online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanisms, in the settlement of business-toconsumer (B2C) disputes. It offers a comparative perspective of two public ODRinitiatives: Consumidor.gov.br, a Brazilian ODR platform, and the EU-provided ODRplatform. Focusing on the institutional and procedural design of these two platforms, wehighlight the factors and incentives that might contribute to increasing consumers’ trustand traders’ engagement in ODR procedures. The article relies on a large dataset fromConsumidor.gov.br, consisting of a sample of more than 800,000 consumer complaints.While the EU ODR platform is not yet very well known among EU consumers, theBrazilian platform is becoming widely popular among Brazilian consumers. It is putforward that this popularity could be the result of the procedural design of the Brazilianplatform, which serves as a direct communication channel between the trader and theconsumer. Furthermore, we argue that the EU ODR platform could be more effective ifthe incentives for both parties, traders and consumers, to use ODR were reinforced. Thearticle provides further policy recommendations on how the potential of ODR can bebetter exploited in light of the two ODR platforms examined.",
keywords = "Business-to-consumer disputes, ODR, Brazil, EU, Effectiveness, Consumer protection, Business-to-consumer disputes, ODR, Brazil, EU, Effectiveness, Consumer protection",
author = "Schmidt-Kessen, {Maria Jose} and Rafaela Nogueira and {Cantero Gamito}, Marta",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 12. February",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10603-020-09448-y",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Policy",
issn = "0168-7034",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success or Failure?

T2 - Effectiveness of Consumer ODR Platforms in Brazil and in the EU

AU - Schmidt-Kessen, Maria Jose

AU - Nogueira, Rafaela

AU - Cantero Gamito, Marta

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 12. February

PY - 2020/2/12

Y1 - 2020/2/12

N2 - This article examines the effectiveness of out-of-court procedures, in particular in theform of online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanisms, in the settlement of business-toconsumer (B2C) disputes. It offers a comparative perspective of two public ODRinitiatives: Consumidor.gov.br, a Brazilian ODR platform, and the EU-provided ODRplatform. Focusing on the institutional and procedural design of these two platforms, wehighlight the factors and incentives that might contribute to increasing consumers’ trustand traders’ engagement in ODR procedures. The article relies on a large dataset fromConsumidor.gov.br, consisting of a sample of more than 800,000 consumer complaints.While the EU ODR platform is not yet very well known among EU consumers, theBrazilian platform is becoming widely popular among Brazilian consumers. It is putforward that this popularity could be the result of the procedural design of the Brazilianplatform, which serves as a direct communication channel between the trader and theconsumer. Furthermore, we argue that the EU ODR platform could be more effective ifthe incentives for both parties, traders and consumers, to use ODR were reinforced. Thearticle provides further policy recommendations on how the potential of ODR can bebetter exploited in light of the two ODR platforms examined.

AB - This article examines the effectiveness of out-of-court procedures, in particular in theform of online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanisms, in the settlement of business-toconsumer (B2C) disputes. It offers a comparative perspective of two public ODRinitiatives: Consumidor.gov.br, a Brazilian ODR platform, and the EU-provided ODRplatform. Focusing on the institutional and procedural design of these two platforms, wehighlight the factors and incentives that might contribute to increasing consumers’ trustand traders’ engagement in ODR procedures. The article relies on a large dataset fromConsumidor.gov.br, consisting of a sample of more than 800,000 consumer complaints.While the EU ODR platform is not yet very well known among EU consumers, theBrazilian platform is becoming widely popular among Brazilian consumers. It is putforward that this popularity could be the result of the procedural design of the Brazilianplatform, which serves as a direct communication channel between the trader and theconsumer. Furthermore, we argue that the EU ODR platform could be more effective ifthe incentives for both parties, traders and consumers, to use ODR were reinforced. Thearticle provides further policy recommendations on how the potential of ODR can bebetter exploited in light of the two ODR platforms examined.

KW - Business-to-consumer disputes

KW - ODR

KW - Brazil

KW - EU

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Consumer protection

KW - Business-to-consumer disputes

KW - ODR

KW - Brazil

KW - EU

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Consumer protection

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376722

U2 - 10.1007/s10603-020-09448-y

DO - 10.1007/s10603-020-09448-y

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Consumer Policy

JF - Journal of Consumer Policy

SN - 0168-7034

ER -